Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psycholog Relig Spiritual. 2016 Aug;8(3):218–227. doi: 10.1037/rel0000062

Table 2.

Standardized Effects with Bias-Corrected Bootstrap 95% Confidence Intervals for All Paths in the Model Shown in Figure 2

Final variable in the path Initial variable in the path
Spiritual Intimacy
Spiritual Meaning
Marital Intimacy
PC 95% CI p PC 95% CI p PC 95% CI p
Standardized Direct Effects
 Spiritual Meaning (SM) .64 [.61, .67] .002
 Marital Intimacy (MI) −.07 [−.12, −.03] .001 .29 [.24, .35] .002
 Well-Being (WB) −.07 [−.12, −.03] .005 .57 [.52, .63] .002 .46 [.42, .49] .002
Standardized Indirect Effects
 Marital Intimacy (MI) .19a [.15, .22] .001
 Well-Being (WB) .42b [.38, .46] .003 .13c [.11, .16] .001
Standardized Total Effects
 Spiritual Meaning (SM) .64 [.61, .67] .002
 Marital Intimacy (MI) .11 [.08, .15] .003 .29 [.24, .35] .001
 Well-Being (WB) .35 [.30, .38] .003 .70 [.66, .76] .002 .46 [.42, .49] .002

Note. PC = path coefficient; CI = confidence interval;

a

SI→SM→MI.

b

SI→SM→WB + SI→SM→MI→WB.

c

SM→MI→WB.