Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2016 Jul 1;52(59):9283–9286. doi: 10.1039/c6cc04735a

Table 1.

Reaction approach and optimization

graphic file with name nihms-800027-f0004.jpg
Entrya Solvent % cat. Equiv MsOH Temp. (°C) 2 (%)b 3 (%)b 4 (%)b
1 THF 20 - rt 78 - -
2 Dioxane 20 - rt 96 - -
3 Diethyl ether 20 - rt 59 - -
4 MTBE 20 - rt 64 - -
5 2-methyl THF 20 - rt 66 - -
6c Dioxane 10 - rt 68 - -
7d Dioxane 5 - rt trace - -
8c Dioxane 5 - 45 trace - -
9 THF 20 6.5 rt 70 0 0
10 Dioxane 20 6.5 rt 30 36 38
11e Dioxane 20 7.5 rt, then 40 0 0 90
a

optimization reactions conducted on a 0.04 mmol scale (0.1 M) using 20% catalyst, 1.2 equivalents of aldehyde, and 1.2 equivalents of Cs2CO3 unless otherwise noted.

b

yield of isolated material

c

conducted at 0.2 M concentration

d

conducted at 0.4 M concentration

e

conducted on a 0.4 mmol scale; cyclization reaction went to completion overnight.