Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):625–629. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12786

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Effect of fat suppression on R2* estimation. Regression slope (left) is shown as function of fitting model. Error bars denote 95% CIs. Bias and coefficient of variation are shown for images collected with and without saturation (right). Bias is displayed as absolute value to facilitate plotting (fat saturation consistently lowered R2* estimates). 2P = two parameter, 3P = three parameter, Avg = average, PW = pixelwise.