TABLE 1.
Algorithm Name | Type of ROI | Type of Fitting | Curve-Fitting Model | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
R2*_PW_GA(3P) | Entire liver profile in the slice | Pixelwise approach | Offset model | [5] |
R2*_Avg_GA(3P) | Entire liver profile in the slice | Averaged-signal approach | Offset model | [15] |
R2*_Avg_GA(2P) | Entire liver profile in the slice | Averaged-signal approach | Truncation model | Not applicable |
R2*_PW_ROI(3P) | Area of homogeneous liver tissue | Pixelwise approach | Offset model | [16] |
R2*_Avg_ROI(3P) | Area of homogeneous liver tissue | Averaged-signal approach | Offset model | [18] |
R2*_Avg_ROI(2P) | Area of homogeneous liver tissue | Averaged-signal approach | Truncation model | [17] |
Note—Each approach is defined by three different aspects and two approaches differ for at least one of these aspects. PW = pixelwise, GA = global analysis, 3P = three parameter, Avg = average, 2P = two parameter.