Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 13;10(3):282–298. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1128623

Table 2.

Proteins identified by SELDI-TOF-based proteomic analysis in this study and comparison with the results obtained by previous transcriptomic and proteomic studies comparing pre-receptive and receptive endometrium samples. The fold change relative to pre-receptive endometrium is indicated.

Present study
Transcriptomic studies
Proteomic studies
Protein name Identification peak Carson et al., 2002 Riesewijk et al., 2003 Mirkin et al., 2005 Talbi et al., 2006 Haouzi et al., 2009a Diaz et al., 2011 Li et al., 2006 Domínguez et al., 2009
APOC1 4,470 m/z 1.6 2.9
FGB 4,470 m/z, 7,465 m/z 2 34.6
KRT7 4,470 m/z 6 8.3 5.4
LCP1 7,465 m/z 2.6 1.6 1.6
MYL9 4,470 m/z 6 4.7
S100A4 7,465 m/z 7 2.5 3.9 4.6
S100A6 7,465 m/z 1.8 4.5
TAGLN 4,470 m/z 6 5.9 1.7
S100A10 7,465 m/z 3.5 4.8
ENO2 4,470 m/z, 7,465 m/z 2.3
GLRX 7,465 m/z 3.4
LMOD1 4,470 m/z 10.2
PTRF 4,470 m/z, 7,465 m/z 2.0
PYGB 4,470 m/z 4.8
S100A11 7,465 m/z 2.1
SYNPO2 4,470 m/z 2.1