Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016 Mar 1;87(2):165–173. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1143909

Table 3.

Description of sample participating in park interviews and responses by whether or not they used the park to walk/watch the dog (among NC and PA parks; n=600)

Overall Missing Walk/ Watch Dog Other p value* Cramer’s V

n % n % %
Overall 600 100.0 0 27.5 72.5
Gender 0 0.86 0.01
Female 338 56.3 55.8 56.6
Male 262 43.7 44.2 43.5
Age Group 0 0.31 0.06
18–35 289 48.2 52.1 46.7
36–59 270 45.0 40.0 46.9
>=60 41 6.8 7.9 6.4
Race-ethnicity 0.002 0.13
Non-Hispanic White 439 73.2 0 81.8 69.9
African American 79 13.2 9.7 14.5
Hispanic 30 5.0 4.2 5.3
Other 52 8.7 4.2 10.3
Health status (compared to fair/poor) 0.89 0.01
Excellent/very good/good 544 91.1 3 90.9 91.2
Body mass index 56 0.004 0.14
Under or normal weight 318 58.5 60.5 57.7
Overweight 171 31.4 23.7 34.4
Obese 55 10.1 15.8 7.9
How often you come to this park 0
Daily 97 16.2 27.9 11.7 <0.0001 0.22
A few times a week 206 34.3 37.6 33.1
Once per week or more 297 49.5 34.6 55.2
On a typical day when you visit the park, how long do you stay 0.20
<=1 hour 247 41.2 0 53.3 36.6 <0.0001
>1 hour but <2 hours 241 40.2 39.4 40.6
>=2 hours 111 18.5 7.3 22.8
Last time you went to the park, how did you get there 0.02
Walked 156 26.2 5 27.4 25.8 0.68
Accompanied by anyone <0.0001 0.41
Alone 224 37.5 2 69.9 25.3
Euclidean distance from home to park 71 0.67 0.07
0–0.25 miles 65 12.3 11.1 12.8
>0.25–0.50 miles 58 11.0 11.8 10.6
>0.50–1.0 miles 102 19.3 22.9 17.8
>1.0–2.0 miles 93 17.6 15.7 18.4
>2.0 miles 211 39.9 38.6 40.4
Park 0 <0.0001 0.31
PA park 1 155 25.8 23.6 26.7
NC park 1 146 24.3 17.0 27.1
NC park 2 149 24.8 46.1 16.8
NC park 3 150 25.0 13.3 29.4
*

p value is based on a chi-squared test