Skip to main content
. 2016 May 10;57(4):905–914. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.905

Table 2. Subject Baseline Characteristics (ITT Population of Double-Blind Phase).

Variable Denosumab (n=69) Placebo (n=66)
Age, mean±SD (range) 67.0±4.86 (60-81) 66.0±4.77 (60-78)
Height, cm, mean±SD 152.2±4.94 154.3±5.25
Weight, kg, mean±SD 54.4±6.68 56.5±6.31
BMI, kg/m2, mean±SD (range) 23.5±2.83 (14.0-30.0) 23.7±2.29 (18.9-27.9)
Years since menopause, mean±SD 19.0±7.02 17.5±6.20
Previous fracture*, n (%) 21 (30) 15 (23)
Parent history of hip fracture, n (%) 1 (1) 5 (8)
Corrected T-score, mean±SD
 Femoral neck -2.5±0.56 -2.4±0.61
 Total hip -2.0±0.64 -1.9±0.65
 Total spine -3.0±0.59 -2.9±0.58
 Trochanter -2.2±0.63 -2.2±0.66
s-CTX, µg/L, mean±SD 0.611±0.2975 0.537±0.2421
s-PINP, µg/L, mean±SD 60.2±25.17 57.7±25.90
10-yr probability (%) of hip fracture
 Hologic 4.9±4.40 4.8±3.47
 Lunar 3.9±2.79 3.9±3.56
10-yr probability (%) of major osteoporotic fracture
 Hologic 11.4±6.54 11.6±4.53
 Lunar 10.2±4.46 10.2±6.00

BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; ITT, intent to treat; SD, standard deviation; s-CTX, serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; s-PINP, serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide.

*Most common was prior wrist fracture (6 in denosumab group and 4 in placebo group), Fracture probability was calculated using screening femoral neck BMD assessments in the World Health Organization's Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) model.