Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 3;31(8):1231–1238. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.8.1231

Table 3. Comparison of threat and efficacy in news with cancer statistics, for top 10 most-covered cancers in the news.

Cancer type News threat News efficacy Incidence Mortality Incidence change (APC) Rank difference
Rank Rank Rank % Rank % Rank Δ% I-TH M-TH C-TH I-EF M-EF C-EF
Breast 4 8 6 7.2 6 2.7 4 6.0 +2 +2 0 -2 -2 -4
Colorectal 5 1 3 12.9 4 10.5 5 5.3 -2 -1 0 2 +3 +4
Cervical 8 3 9 1.9 8 1.3 10 -4.2 +1 0 +2 +6 +5 +7
Prostate 9 6 7 3.9 7 1.8 2 13.0 -2 -2 -7 +1 +1 -4
Lung 3 7 4 10.2 1 21.8 7 0.0 +1 -2 +4 -3 -6 0
Skin 6 4 10 1.9 9 0.6 3 6.5 +4 +3 -3 +6 +5 -1
Thyroid 7 10 1 17.6 10 0.5 1 22.3 -6 +3 -6 -9 0 -9
Liver 2 2 5 7.9 2 15.7 9 -1.9 +3 0 +7 +3 0 +7
Stomach 10 5 2 14.7 3 13.9 8 -0.3 -8 -7 -2 -3 -2 +3
Pancreatic 1 9 8 2.3 5 6.0 6 1.5 +7 +4 +5 -1 -4 -3

Number of news stories = 465. Rank is a hierarchical score among each category, from the highest (1) to the lowest (10). Rank difference was calculated by subtracting news rank from actual cancer statistics rank. For example, a positive score means that threat of getting a particular cancer was over-emphasized in the news in comparison to its actual incidence, morality, or APC.

I, incidence; M, mortality; C, incidence change (APC); TH, threat; EF, efficacy.