Table 2.
GLS model results for betaa
| Odor period |
Preodor period |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | E2 | E1 | E2 | |
| Intercepta,b,c,d | 5.97 (0.85)*** | 5.13 (2.38)* | 2.26 (0.50)*** | 3.27 (0.67)*** |
| Taskc | ||||
| GNG | Reference | |||
| TAC | −0.14 (0.26) | −0.29 (0.54) | 0.48 (0.17)** | 0.07 (0.16) |
| Region | ||||
| OB | Reference | |||
| aPC | 0.45 (0.23)* | −0.68 (0.53) | 0.30 (0.16) | 0.47 (0.16)** |
| Odor seta,b | ||||
| T | Reference | |||
| EX | 0.21 (0.85) | — | 0.49 (0.57) | — |
| S2 | 1.60 (0.92) | 3.7 (1.94) | 0.69 (0.63) | −0.85 (0.59) |
| S3 | 0.10 (0.84) | −0.52 (1.89) | 0.68 (0.57) | −1.11 (0.57) |
| S4 | 0.39 (0.60) | −1.23 (1.55) | −0.02 (0.4) | −0.85 (0.45) |
| S5 | 0.26 (0.61) | — | 0.54 (0.4) | — |
| S6 | 1.99 (2.08) | — | 0.79 (1.43) | — |
| S8 | — | −2.38 (1.91) | — | −0.59 (0.57) |
| Odorb | ||||
| A | Reference | |||
| B | 0.09 (0.25) | −1.18 (0.57)* | 0.07 (0.17) | −0.02 (0.17) |
| logVP (power/kPa) | 0.96 (0.70) | −0.45 (1.24) | 0.02 (0.48) | −0.11 (0.39) |
| Performance (power/%) | 0.003 (0.004) | 0.004 (0.01) | 0.001 (0.002) | 0.01 (0.003) |
| Sampling durationb,c,d,e (power/ms) | −0.004 (0.001)*** | 0.003 (0.001)* | −0.001 (0.0003)*** | 0.001 (0.0004)** |
| Daye (power/d) | −0.02 (0.04) | −0.18 (0.16) | 0.04 (0.02) | −0.13 (0.05)** |
aOdor sets are identified in the coefficient column by name or S + number (for odors, see Table 1). logVP, Log of the average theoretical vapor pressure for the odor set; T-S8, odor sets (see Table 1).
bOdor Experiment 1 (Wald F test).
cOdor Experiment 2 (Wald F test).
dPreodor Experiment 1 (Wald F test).
ePreodor Experiment 2 (Wald F test).
*p = 0.05;
**p = 0.01;
***p = 0.001 level; significant coefficient (t value); #for a continuous factor, the Wald F test was significant, but the t value for the coefficient was not significant.