Skip to main content
. 2016 May 27;28(2):185–194. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2016.29

Table 6.

Distribution of Units under Research according to CIPP Components and Teaching Status among Faculty Members

CIPP component Teaching status
p Fisher exact test
Full time Part time
Context Goals, organization and management area Low 13 (28.3) 5 (35.7) 0.38 1.94
Middle 28 (60.9) 6 (42.9)
High 5 (10.9) 3 (21.4)
Input Students Low 14 (30.4) 6 (42.9) 0.40 2.12
Middle 26 (56.5) 5 (35.7)
High 6 (13) 3 (21.4)
Research and educational spaces and equipment Low 39 (84.8) 6 (42.9) 0.002 11.04
Middle 7 (15.2) 6 (42.9)
High 0 2 (14.3)
Process Educational courses and programs, teaching and learning process Low 19 (41.3) 6 (42.9) 1.00 0.284
Middle 24 (52.2) 7 (50)
High 3 (6.5) 1 (7.1)
Program evaluation Low 19 (42.2) 7 (50) 0.61 1.10
Middle 22 (48.9) 5 (35.7)
High 4 (8.9) 2 (14.3)

Data are presented as frequency (%).

CIPP: Context input process product.