Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;4(6):2325967116654651. doi: 10.1177/2325967116654651

Quality Appraisal of Studies Revieweda

Lead Author (Year) Journal Level of Evidence No. of Patients Mean Follow-up (1 = yes, 0 = no) Control Group (1 = yes, 0 = no) Randomization (1 = yes, 0 = no) Standardization (1 = yes, 0 = no) Selection Bias (1 = yes, 0 = no) Baseline Characteristics (Function) (1 = yes, 0 = no) Follow up >12 mo (1 = yes, 0 = no) Loss to Follow-up >15% Primary Outcome Excellent/Good Summary
Baumgarten2 (1998) Am J Sports Med 4 17 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) No formal outcome assessment used; 4 of 17 reported any pain Low to very low
Bojanić3 (2012) Croat Med J 4 9 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 N/A (retrospective) 9 Low to very low
Byrd4 (2002) Am J Sports Med 4 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) 10 Low to very low
Harada6 (2002) J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) No formal outcome assessment used; no pain reported by any with activities of daily living Low to very low
Hennrikus7 (2015) J Pediatr Orthop 4 24 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 N/A (retrospective) 24.00 Low to very low
Iwasaki8 (2009) J Bone Joint Surg Am 4 19 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 18 Low to very low
Kosaka10 (2013) J Pediatr Orthop 4 32 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 29 Low to very low
Kuwahata12 (1998) Orthopaedics 4 7 patients, 8 elbows 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 No formal outcome assessment used Low to very low
Lewine13 (2015) J Pediatr Orthop 4 21 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A (retrospective) Average postop Timmerman-Andrews score = 184.3; breakdown by patient not given Low to very low
Lyons14 (2015) J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) Average overall DASH score = 1.4; breakdown by patient not given Low to very low
Maruyama15 (2014) Am J Sports Med 4 33 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 29 Low to very low
McManama16 (1985) Am J Sports Med 4 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) 13 Low to very low
Mihara17 (2009) J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4 27 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 N/A (retrospective) 11 Low to very low
Miyake19 (2011) J Hand Surg Am 4 106 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) No formal outcome assessment used Low to very low
Nishinaka22 (2014) J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4 22 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Average postop Timmerman-Andrews score = 169; individual patient breakdown not given Low to very low
Nobuta23 (2008) Upsala J Med Sci 4 28 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) 24 Low to very low
Ruch24 (1998) Arthroscopy 4 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) Nonspecified questionnaire used at follow up; no good/excellent scales defined Low to very low
Schoch25 (2010) Arthroscopy 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) Mean postop DASH score = 8.6 (range, 0-22.41); no breakdown of excellent/good results given Low to very low
Shimada26 (2012) J Bone Joint Surg Am 4 26 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 N/A (retrospective) 22 Low to very low
Takeda28 (2002) Am J Sports Med 4 11 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 N/A (retrospective) 10 Low to very low
Tivnon29 (1976) Am J Sports Med 4 12 patients, 15 surgeries 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A (retrospective) 4 (based off of return to sport only) Low to very low
Tsuda30 (2005) Arthroscopy 4 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 30/33 lost to follow-up 3 Low to very low
Uchida31 (2015) Am J Sports Med 4 18 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 17 Low to very low
Yamamoto34 (2006) Am J Sports Med 4 18 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 Only mean Timmerman-Andrews scores given; individual breakdown not provided Low to very low

aDASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; N/A, not applicable; postop, postoperative.