Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 17;23(e1):e169–e179. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv152

Table 2:

Error classes of five studies that reported error types SR and DT (after Kanal, 2001).

Author Date Title SR or DT Class 0 Errors / Report Class 1 Errors / Report Class 2 Errors / Report Class 3 Errors / Report
Formatting Errors Grammatically Incorrect Meaning Different (error was obvious) Meaning Different (error not obvious)
Basma et al. 2011 Error rates in breast imaging reports: comparison of automatic speech recognition and dictation transcription SR Punctuation error 0.16 Verb tense 0.04 Word omission 0.14 Wrong word 0.01
Spelling mistakes 0.03 Plural 0.06 Word substitution 0.13 Incorrect measurement 0.01
Incomplete phrase 0.01 Nonsense phrase 0.02 Missing or added “no” 0.01
Added word 0.15
DT Punctuation error 0.02 Verb tense 0.02 Word omission 0.04 Wrong word 0.00
Spelling mistakes 0.03 Plural 0.02 Word substitution 0.05 Incorrect measurement 0.00
Incomplete phrase 0.00 Nonsense phrase 0.00 Missing or added “no” 0.00
Added word 0.04
Chang et al. 2011 Nonclinical errors using voice recognition dictation software for radiology reports: a retrospective audit Combined Type E – punctuation 0.03 Type F – other including spelling 0.03 Type A – wrong word substitution 0.18 Type C – deletion 0.07
Type D – insertion 0.13
SR Type B – Nonsense phrase 0.02
DT Type B – Nonsense phrase 0.05
David et al. 2014 Error rates in physician dictation: quality assurance and medical record production SR Made up words 0.14 Age mismatch 0.03 Wrong patient 0.07
Gender mismatch 0.05 Wrong drug name/dosage 0.05
Wrong name 0.01 Name/dosage 0.04
Wrong doctor 0.02 Wrong lab values 0.01
Wrong date 0.01 Left/right discrepancy 0.03
Other 0.20 Medical discrepancy other 0.00
DT Made up words 0.11 Age mismatch 0.04 Wrong patient 0.05
Gender mismatch 0.02 Wrong drug 0.05
Wrong name 0.02 Name/dosage 0.01
Wrong doctor 0.02 Wrong lab values 0.03
Wrong date 0.03 Left/right discrepancy 0.02
Other 0.38 Medical discrepancy other 0.04
McGurk et al. 2008 The effect of voice recognition software on comparative error rates in radiology reports SR Trivial (no changes to understanding) 0.02 Effect understanding 0.03
DT Trivial (no changes to understanding) 0.01 Effect understanding 0.01
Ramaswamy et al. 2000 Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: Advantages, disadvantages, and impact SR Irregular spacing 2.98 Spelling errors 0.30 Omissions and duplications 0.372
DT Irregular spacing 0.11 Spelling errors 1.12 Omissions and duplications 0.1116

Class 0 errors: no change in meaning and grammatically correct; class 1 errors: no change in meaning but grammatically incorrect; class 2 errors: meaning was different but error was obvious; class 3 errors: meaning was different but not obvious.28