Table 4. Effect of community engagement interventions on staff motivation levels (n = 234).
Matching algorithm: Nearest Neighbor (NN) | Outcome indicators | ++ATT (T-stat) | SE | Number of Intervention | Number of Control |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greater Accra region | Motivation factor 1 | 3.09(1.23)** | 0.121 | 107 | 121 |
Motivation factor 2 | 1.71(-1.27)** | 0.136 | 104 | 120 | |
Motivation factor 3 | 3.59(3.57)** | 0.070 | 104 | 120 | |
Motivation factor 4 | 3.05(3.74)** | 0.154 | 107 | 120 | |
Motivation factor 5 | 3.25(4.89)** | 0.115 | 107 | 119 | |
Overall motivation | 2.93(3.37)** | 0.076 | 116 | 104 | |
Western region | Motivation factor 1 | 2.88(0.39)* | 0.148 | 101 | 114 |
Motivation factor 2 | 1.92(-0.94)* | 0.130 | 99 | 116 | |
Motivation factor 3 | 3.69(2.89)* | 0.095 | 101 | 117 | |
Motivation factor 4 | 3.35(6.42)* | 0.167 | 99 | 111 | |
Motivation factor 5 | 3.23(3.05)* | 0.129 | 100 | 115 | |
Overall motivation | 3.01(2.85)* | 0.088 | 96 | 104 |
Source: WOTRO-COHEiSION Ghana Project (2014).
* Pseudo R2<1.0.
** Pseudo R2 <0.05.
++ATT (Average treatment effect on the treated). The ATT values are the propensity score matching output and they depict the impact of the treatment (SCE interventions) on each of the staff motivation markers, high values imply higher treatment effect and vice versa.
Legend: SE (Standard Error); Motivation factor 1 (Physical work environment and resource availability); Motivation factor 2 (Financial/extrinsic incentives); Motivation factor 3 (Intrinsic incentives including cordiality with clients and co-workers); Motivation factor 4 (Career prospects); Motivation factor 5 (Perceived workload and staff availability); Overall motivation (Overall score based on all five motivation factors).