Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0159822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159822

Table 3. Intraclass and Dyad- and Individual-Level Correlations between Variables among Romantic Heterosexual Relationships in Study 2 (N = 76–114 couples).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Relationship efficacy of dyad .40 *** .00 .02 .28 ** .16 .33 ** .55 **
2. Gender −.07 1 *** .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
3. Relationship duration .00 .00 1 *** .07 −.06 −.03 −.03
4. Frequency −.12 .05 .00 .81 *** .33 ** .52 *** −.26
5. Diversity −.10 .03 .00 −.03 .75 *** .78 *** −.06
6. Strength .19 .11 .00 .22 ** .05 .38 *** −.09
7. Life satisfaction .24 * −.06 .00 .27 * .08 .26 * .34 **

Note. Boldface values are the intraclass correlations. Values above the diagonal are dyad-level correlations; values below the diagonal are individual-level correlations.

* p < .05,

** p < .01,

*** p < .001.