Table 3. Intraclass and Dyad- and Individual-Level Correlations between Variables among Romantic Heterosexual Relationships in Study 2 (N = 76–114 couples).
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Relationship efficacy of dyad | .40 | *** | .00 | .02 | .28 | ** | .16 | .33 | ** | .55 | ** | |||
2. Gender | −.07 | −1 | *** | .00 | .00 | .00 | .00 | .00 | ||||||
3. Relationship duration | .00 | .00 | 1 | *** | .07 | −.06 | −.03 | −.03 | ||||||
4. Frequency | −.12 | .05 | .00 | .81 | *** | .33 | ** | .52 | *** | −.26 | ||||
5. Diversity | −.10 | .03 | .00 | −.03 | .75 | *** | .78 | *** | −.06 | |||||
6. Strength | .19 | .11 | .00 | .22 | ** | .05 | .38 | *** | −.09 | |||||
7. Life satisfaction | .24 | * | −.06 | .00 | .27 | * | .08 | .26 | * | .34 | ** |
Note. Boldface values are the intraclass correlations. Values above the diagonal are dyad-level correlations; values below the diagonal are individual-level correlations.
* p < .05,
** p < .01,
*** p < .001.