Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 21;6:70. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0167-z

Table 3.

Reliability and feasibility

Per sensor
Initialization time 27 min
Total time until first displayed value 37.5 min [36/42]
Expected monitoring time after initialization 72 h
Actual monitoring time after initialization 37.9 h [23/71.3]
 Real-time data display 32.5 h [16/62.4]
 Percentage of real-time data display/expected monitoring time after initialization 45.1 %
 Percentage of real-time data display/actual monitoring time after initialization 84.8 % [67.9/93.8]
Data gaps after initialization 5 h [1.9/8.3]
 Percentage of data gaps/actual monitoring time after initialization 15.2 % [6.2/32.1]
 Number of performed calibrations 9.5 [6/13]
Reasons for the 11,568 min (192.8 h) of data gaps Percentage of data gaps 11,568 min (192.8 h) Percentage of monitoring time 80,223 min (1337.1 h)
1 Poor sensor signal (%) 23.3 3.4
2 Sensor failure (%) 15.0 2.2
3 Processor line error (%) 10.9 1.6
4 Disconnection (%) 15.6 2.3
5 Pending after reconnection (%) 3.4 0.5
6 Calibration required (%) 27.8 4.0
7 Others (%) 4.0 0.6
Device-related reasons (1–3) (%) 49.2 7.2
Not device related (4–7) (%) 50.8 7.4
Reasons for 21 prematurely sensor removals Number of sensors Percentage of all sensors (%) Percentage of removed sensors (%)
Sensors 72 h completed 10 32.3
Sensors removed prematurely 21 67.7 100
1 Accidentally 7 22.6 33.3
2 Poor sensor signal during measurement 7 22.6 33.3
3 Poor sensor signal immediately after initialization 1 3.2 4.8
4 MRI 1 3.2 4.8
5 Discharge 1 3.2 4.8
6 Death 2 6.5 9.5
7 Others 2 6.5 9.5
Device-related reasons (1–3) 15 48.4 71.4
Not device related (4–7) 6 19.4 28.6

n = 20 patients, 31 sensors

Results are expressed as median with interquartile range or as absolute numbers with percentages

MRI magnetic resonance imaging