. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 21.

Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2012 Dec 22;92(4):362–371. doi: 10.1007/s00223-012-9687-1

Table. 2.

Estimate significance between genders and between B6 and congenic mice

	Mid. TV	Cr. BV	Cr. BV/TV	Tb. TV	Tb. BV	Tb. BV/TV	Tb.Th	Tb. N	Tb. S
B6.F vs B6.M	<0.001	<0.001	0.19	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
Cong.F vs Cong. M	0.039	0.003	0.10	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.7	<0.001	<0.001
B6.F vs Cong. F	0.018	0.04	0.61	0.214	0.005	0.003	<0.001	0.957	0.792
B6. M vs Cong. M	0.6	0.13	0.65	0.109	0.526	0.83	0.982	0.703	0.636

Mid. TV, for tissue volume at the femur mid-diaphysis; Cr. BV, for cortical bone volume; Cr. BV/TV, for cortical BV/TV; Tb. TV, for trabecular TV. Identity/Gaussian model was the best model for TV and Tb. S. Log inverse Gaussian model was the best model for Tb. BV, Tb. BV/TV, Tb. Th, Tb. N. The best model for each parameter was used to determine the significance in the difference between genders and between the two lines of mice.