Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2012 Dec 22;92(4):362–371. doi: 10.1007/s00223-012-9687-1

Table. 2.

Estimate significance between genders and between B6 and congenic mice

Mid. TV Cr. BV Cr. BV/TV Tb. TV Tb. BV Tb. BV/TV Tb.Th Tb. N Tb. S
B6.F vs B6.M <0.001 <0.001 0.19 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Cong.F vs Cong. M 0.039 0.003 0.10 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.7 <0.001 <0.001
B6.F vs Cong. F 0.018 0.04 0.61 0.214 0.005 0.003 <0.001 0.957 0.792
B6. M vs Cong. M 0.6 0.13 0.65 0.109 0.526 0.83 0.982 0.703 0.636

Mid. TV, for tissue volume at the femur mid-diaphysis; Cr. BV, for cortical bone volume; Cr. BV/TV, for cortical BV/TV; Tb. TV, for trabecular TV. Identity/Gaussian model was the best model for TV and Tb. S. Log inverse Gaussian model was the best model for Tb. BV, Tb. BV/TV, Tb. Th, Tb. N. The best model for each parameter was used to determine the significance in the difference between genders and between the two lines of mice.