Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr 7;14(8):1155–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.044

Table 2.

a. Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps for High, Intermediate, and Low Bowel Prep Quality
Entire Colon Right Colon
Prep Quality Detection Rate
n (%, 95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Detection Rate
n (%, 95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
High
(N=517)
62
(12.0%, 9.3–15.1%)
Reference 41
(7.9%, 5.8–10.6%)
Reference
Intermediate
(N=130)
6
(4.6%, 1.7–9.8%)
0.37 (0.15–0.87) 2
(1.5%, 0.2–5.4%)
0.19 (0.05–0.81)
Low
(N=102)
5
(4.9%, 1.6–11.1%)
0.38 (0.15–0.99) 2
(2.0%, 0.2–6.9%)
0.26 (0.06–1.11)
b. Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps plus Proximal Large Hyperplastic Polyps* for High,
Intermediate, and Low Bowel Prep Quality
Entire Colon Right Colon
Prep Quality Detection Rate
n (%, 95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Detection Rate
n (%, 95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
High
(N=517)
67
(12.2%, 9.5–15.3%)
Reference 44
(8.1%, 5.9–10.8%)
Reference
Intermediate
(N=130)
6
(4.6%, 1.7–9.8%)
0.36 (0.15 –0.85) 2
(1.5%, 0.2–5.4%)
0.19 (0.04–0.79)
Low
(N=102)
5
(4.9%, 1.6–11.1%)
0.37 (0.14–0.96) 2
(2.0%, 0.2–6.9%)
0.25 (0.06–1.07)

Detection rates are per-patient rates and “n” represents the number of patients in each category.

*

Proximal = right and transverse colon (entire colon analysis) or right colon (right colon analysis); large = ≥1cm.