Table 3.
MIA: STEP and SAU supervision adherence and competence by supervision condition and site.
| Supervision Condition
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale | MIA: STEP | SAU | Supervision Condition | Site | Condition x Site |
| MIA: STEP Consistent Strategies | |||||
| Adherence | |||||
| M | 4.67 | 2.27 |
F(1, 209)=108.52 p =.000 |
F(10, 209) =3.36 p =.000 |
F(10, 209) =1.16 p =.320 |
| SD | 1.60 | 1.22 | |||
| N | 155 | 55 | |||
| Competence | |||||
| M | 5.05 | 3.72 |
F(1, 190) =42.88 p =.000 |
F(10, 190) =4.86 p =.000 |
F(10, 190) =.757 p =.670 |
| SD | 1.19 | 1.40 | |||
| N | 148 | 43 | |||
| General Supervision Strategies | |||||
| Adherence | |||||
| M | 1.91 | 2.88 |
F(1, 209) =62.64 p =.000 |
F(10, 209) =2.30 p =.014 |
F(10, 209) =1.21 p =.286 |
| SD | .79 | .67 | |||
| N | 155 | 55 | |||
| Competence | |||||
| M | 3.96 | 3.91 |
F(1, 174) =.026 p =.873 |
F(10, 174) =2.25 p =.018 |
F(10, 174) =1.14 p =.334 |
| SD | 1.11 | 1.00 | |||
| N | 120 | 55 | |||
| MI Supervision Style | |||||
| M | 4.12 | 2.00 |
F(1, 209) =64.24 p =.000 |
F(10, 209) =3.06 p =.001 |
F(10, 209) =1.41 p =.178 |
| SD | 1.84 | 1.55 | |||
| N | 155 | 55 | |||
Note. MIA: STEP = Motivational Interviewing Assessment: Supervisory Tools for Enhancing Proficiency, SAU = Supervision-as-Usual. Adherence was rated 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = infrequently, 4 = somewhat, 5 = quite a bit, 6 = considerably, 7 = extensively. Competence was rated 1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = acceptable, 4 = adequate, 5 = good, 6 = very good; 7 = excellent. A familywise alpha of p <.01 (.05/5) marked significant effects.