Table 4.
Clinician MI adherence and competence by supervision condition and trial case.
Supervision Condition
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | MIA: STEP M (SD) |
SAU M (SD) |
Supervision Condition | Trial Case | Condition by Trial Interaction | |
Post-trial outcomes | ||||||
Fundamental MI Adherence | ||||||
Baseline | 3.71 (.87) | 3.55 (.78) | F | 8.16 | 8.22 | 3.12 |
Post-Workshop | 4.43 (.70) | 4.07 (.72) | p | .01 | .01 | .08 |
1 | 4.84 (.59) | 4.27 (.96) | df | 1, 114 | 1, 238 | 1, 468 |
2 | 4.68 (.93) | 4.16 (.74) | d | .53 | .08 | .54 |
3 | 4.53 (.81) | 4.08 (.88) | ||||
4 | 4.94 (.79) | 4.06 (.86) | ||||
5 | 4.65 (.84) | 4.08 (.77) | ||||
6 | 4.46 (.97) | 3.90 (1.03) | ||||
7 | 4.33 (.61) | 3.87 (.74) | ||||
16-week follow-up | 4.73 (.59) | 3.66 (1.18) | F | 7.21 | 8.22 | 6.44 |
p | .01 | .01 | .11 | |||
df | 1, 113 | 1, 228 | 1, 512 | |||
d | .33 | .05 | .46 | |||
Fundamental MI Competence | ||||||
Baseline | 3.57 (.75) | 3.74 (.69) | F | 1.76 | 9.29 | 5.73 |
Post-Workshop | 4.14 (.68) | 3.91 (.79) | p | .19 | .00 | .01 |
1 | 4.36 (.72) | 4.04 (.74) | df | 1, 137 | 1, 480 | 1, 521 |
2 | 4.21 (.83) | 3.84 (.66) | d | .20 | .08 | .63 |
3 | 4.28 (.84) | 3.98 (.68) | ||||
4 | 4.42 (.89) | 3.90 (.58) | ||||
5 | 4.15 (.71) | 3.79 (.57) | ||||
6 | 4.18 (.65) | 3.90 (.80) | ||||
7 | 4.35 (.74) | 3.82 (.61) | ||||
16-week follow-up | 4.47 (.65) | 3.87 (.63) | F | 1.87 | 11.63 | 7.18 |
p | .17 | .00 | .01 | |||
df | 1, 169 | 1, 524 | 1, 521 | |||
d | .20 | .08 | .72 | |||
Advanced MI Adherence | ||||||
Baseline | 2.01 (.78) | 2.03 (.83) | F | 4.51 | 6.95 | 2.46 |
Post-Workshop | 2.81 (.79) | 2.54 (.85) | p | .04 | .01 | .12 |
1 | 3.56 (1.04) | 2.97 (1.25) | df | 1, 120 | 1, 125 | 1, 469 |
2 | 3.25 (.97) | 3.03 (1.20) | d | .33 | .10 | .43 |
3 | 3.51 (1.26) | 2.43 (.95) | ||||
4 | 3.25 (1.11) | 2.77 (1.21) | ||||
5 | 3.47 (1.27) | 2.72 (.96) | ||||
6 | 3.17 (1.10) | 2.68 (1.18) | ||||
7 | 3.01 (.88) | 2.65 (1.07) | ||||
16-week follow-up | 3.23 (.75) | 2.19 (.65) | F | 4.23 | 9.07 | 4.45 |
p | .04 | .00 | .04 | |||
df | 1,122 | 1,238 | 1,516 | |||
d | .36 | .10 | .65 | |||
Advanced MI Competence | ||||||
Baseline | 3.57 (.68) | 3.85 (.37) | F | 0.004 | 16.09 | 12.23 |
Post-Workshop | 3.99 (.53) | 3.85 (.66) | p | .95 | .00 | .00 |
1 | 4.24 (.64) | 4.09 (.66) | df | 1, 126 | 1, 272 | 1, 459 |
2 | 4.28 (.69) | 4.12 (.57) | d | .01 | .09 | .84 |
3 | 4.24 (.73) | 3.98 (.54) | ||||
4 | 4.23 (.57) | 3.88 (.45) | ||||
5 | 4.03 (.65) | 3.80 (.66) | ||||
6 | 4.14 (.45) | 4.00 (.45) | ||||
7 | 4.35 (.64) | 3.71 (.54) | ||||
16-week follow-up | 4.35 (.58) | 3.96 (.71) | F | .02 | 16.14 | 11.31 |
p | .89 | .00 | .00 | |||
df | 1, 141 | 1, 511 | 1, 507 | |||
d | .16 | .08 | .82 | |||
MI Inconsistent Adherence | ||||||
Baseline | 1.53 (.43) | 1.66 (.56) | F | 5.08 | .13 | .04 |
Post-Workshop | 1.39 (.40) | 1.79 (.78) | p | .03 | .72 | .84 |
1 | 1.53 (.45) | 1.71 (.53) | df | 1, 79 | 1, 76 | 1, 76 |
2 | 1.55 (.54) | 1.83 (.56) | d | .34 | .01 | .05 |
3 | 1.75 (.61) | 1.69 (.54) | ||||
4 | 1.54 (.51) | 1.84 (.55) | ||||
5 | 1.55 (.53) | 1.82 (.81) | ||||
6 | 1.40 (.37) | 1.57 (.39) | ||||
7 | 1.62 (.47) | 1.63 (.65) | ||||
16-week follow-up | 1.42 (.44) | 1.69 (.63) | F | 4.86 | .00 | .00 |
p | .03 | .97 | .98 | |||
df | 1, 80 | 1, 71 | 1, 71 | |||
d | .33 | .00 | .01 |
Note. MIA: STEP = Motivational Interviewing Assessment: Supervisory Tools for Enhancing Proficiency, SAU = Supervision-as-Usual. Adherence was rated 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = infrequently, 4 = somewhat, 5 = quite a bit, 6 = considerably, 7 = extensively. Competence was rated 1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = acceptable, 4 = adequate, 5 = good, 6 = very good; 7 = excellent. The random effect of site is nested in training condition within the hierarchical linear regression models. A familywise alpha of p <.01 (.05/5) marked significant effects.