Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2016 May 31;62:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.021

Table 3.

Multivariable models to identify factors associated with flavored other (non-cigarette) tobacco-product only use among current tobacco users—WEIGHTED.

Variable Current Tobacco Users (n=1,104)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p
Age
 18–24 3.41 (1.82–6.40) 0.001 3.22 (1.58–6.56) 0.001 3.45 (1.67–7.12) 0.001 3.50 (1.68–7.30) 0.001
 25–34 ref ref ref ref
Gender
 Male ref ref ref ref
 Female 1.26 (0.68–2.35) 0.458 1.27 (0.66–2.44) 0.474 1.50 (0.79–2.89) 0.213 1.52 (0.80–2.92) 0.204
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic ref ref ref ref
 Black, non-Hispanic 2.01 (0.76–5.36) 0.162 2.34 (0.75–7.29) 0.143 2.39 (0.72–8.00) 0.157 2.58 (0.76–8.68) 0.127
 Other, non-Hispanic 1.24 (0.39–3.92) 0.715 1.02 (0.25–4.26) 0.975 1.30 (0.34–5.00) 0.703 1.21 (0.31–4.81) 0.785
 Hispanic 0.90 (0.41–1.95) 0.787 0.99 (0.45–2.21) 0.986 1.19 (0.53–2.68) 0.671 1.07 (0.45–2.57) 0.872
Education
 Less than high school 0.33 (0.11–0.96) 0.043 0.41 (0.12–1.40) 0.155 0.44 (0.13–1.45) 0.175 0.44 (0.13–1.46) 0.181
 High school ref ref ref ref
 Some college 0.90 (0.45–1.81) 0.765 0.89 (0.40–1.96) 0.768 0.84 (0.39–1.77) 0.641 0.83 (0.39–1.76) 0.620
Self-perceived financial situation
 Don’t/just meet basic needs 0.98 (0.48–2.00) 0.964 1.09 (0.49–2.46) 0.829 1.09 (0.45–2.64) 0.848 1.05 (0.44–2.55) 0.906
 Meet needs with a little left ref ref ref ref
 Live comfortably 3.68 (1.69–8.03) 0.001 3.56 (1.48–8.57) 0.005 3.15 (1.35–7.37) 0.008 3.07 (1.34–7.05) 0.008
Self-identified smoking status
 Smoker/social/occasional smoker 0.21 (0.10–0.43) 0.001 0.18 (0.09–0.37) 0.001 0.18 (0.09–0.36) 0.001
 Ex-smoker/tried smoking/ non-smoker ref ref ref
Anxiety (PHQ—GAD)
 Under the cut-off ref ref
 Over the cut-off 0.32 (0.10–0.98) 0.047 0.30 (0.09–0.94) 0.040

Note: Parent(s) smoked during childhood, alcohol use, buy tobacco products on the Internet and state-level smoking prevalence were included in the models but were excluded from the table because they were not associated with flavored other (non-cigarette) tobacco-product only us among current tobacco users.