Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159830

Table 5. tatistical analysis of relationship of H. pylori sero-positivity with socio-demographic data.

Details Frequency, N (%) H. pylori status (n = 244) Multiple logistic regression for sero-positive vs sero-negative
Sero-positive Sero-negative p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age group
≤30 95 (38.9) 55 (57.9) 40 (42.1 Reference
>30 149 (61.1) 60 (40.3) 89 (59.7 0.007 0.588 (0.205–1.686)
Gender¥
Male 96 (39.8) 54 (56.2) 42 (43.8) Reference
Female 145 (60.2) 60 (41.4) 85 (58.6) 0.026 1.811 (0.503–6.523)
Tribes
Negrito 109 (44.7) 73 (67.0) 36 (33.0) 1.036 (0.306–3.503)
Proto Malay 12 (4.9) 7 (58.3) 5 (41.7) 0.000 2.010 (0.329–12.257)
Senoi 123 (50.4) 35 (28.5) 88 (71.5) Reference
House material ¥
Bamboo 13 (16.9) 12 (92.3) 1 (7.7) Reference
Wood 36 (46.8) 17 (47.2) 19 (52.8) 0.018 0.062 (0.006–0.603)*
Brick/ Cement 28 (36.4) 17 (60.7) 11 (39.3) 0.070 (0.009–1.012)

¥number of respondents less than 244 due to non-response

*significant at level p<0.05