Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 22;8:19. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00019

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Estimating how dense PSD-95 is when protein mobility is slowed sterically. Deff of SEP-TM-Nonbind and of SEP-TM-Bind within synaptic subregions of different PSD-95 densities (n of SEP-TM-Nonbind same as in Figure 6B; that of SEP-TM-Bind same as in Figure 4B; two-way ANOVA, effect of binding F1,6 = 15.27, p < 0.001; effect of regional PSD-95 density F1,6 = 13.53, p < 0.0001; post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons tests between probes in increasing regional densities *p < 0.05, ns, Not significant).