Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 21;6:30006. doi: 10.1038/srep30006

Figure 3. The effects of S. mitis, E. coli, heat-killed P. gingivalis and the supernatant prepared from P. gingivalis cultures on the microglial response.

Figure 3

(a–l) The dynamic response of the microglial processes to the local injection of various bacteria (3.6 × 105 CFU ml−1) at ZT2. (a–c) S. mitis (S.m), (d–f) E. coli (E.c), (g–i) heat killed P.g (HK-P.g; 95 °C, 10 min), (j–l) P.g culture supernatant (P.g SN). Scale bar: 10 μm. (m) The kinetics of the mean fluorescent change in the microglial response measured at 30 min after the injection of various bacteria. The data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. (N = 3 mice, n = 4–5 each). A one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test; P.g vs S.m: p > 0.9999, Pg. vs. E.c: p = 0.9953, P.g vs. HK-P.g: p = 0.4244, S.m vs. E.c: p = 0.9939, S.m vs. HK-P.g: p = 0.4126, E.c vs. HK-P.g: p = 0.5521. (n) The kinetics of the mean fluorescent change in the microglial response measured at 30 min after the injection of P. gingivalis. The data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. (N = 3 mice, n = 5–6 each). A two-tailed unpaired t-test; P.g vs BHI (P.g culture medium, as a control): p = 0.0856.