Table 3.

Separate logistic regression analyses between age-bridging contacts and women’s self-rated depression for various subgroups within the sample. Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI)

	OR	95 % CI	p	n	Nagelkerke
Age
18–40 years	0.45	0.26–0.80**	0.006	239	0.057
41–94 years	0.90	0.61–1.32	0.582	441	0.002
Educational level
High	0.55	0.33–0.92**	0.021	341	0.027
Medium	1.14	0.67–1.95	0.628	215	0.002
Low	0.61	0.31–1.19	0.144	124	0.022
Economic problems
Few	0.50	0.31–0.81*	0.005	295	0.052
Many	0.98	0.64–1.50	0.915	385	0.012
Marital status
Married/cohabiting	0.75	0.49–1.17	0.210	337	0.006
Divorced/widowed	0.80	0.46–1.40	0.438	236	0.009
Never married	0.44	0.18–1.08	0.072	105	0.045
Small children
Children 0–5 years	0.21	0.06–0.68*	0.010	63	0.217
No small children	0.80	0.58–1.12	0.191	617	0.004
Nature of work
Manual labour	0.88	0.37–2.08	0.774	84	0.001
Manual labour, skilled	0.50	0.19–1.27	0.145	76	0.039
Intellectual work	0.82	0.43–1.57	0.547	141	0.004
Intellectual work, skilled	0.57	0.32–1.02	0.056	253	0.035
Intellectual work, leading position	1.07	0.21–5.43	0.931	41	0.031

*p < 0.05 **p < 0.005 ***p < 0.001

NOTE: Standardised according to the educational-level proportions of the Moscow City population given in the 2002 census for the population over 18 years