Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 16;95(5):1105–1115. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew003

Table 1.

Litter treatments and conditions adopted across six sequential farming cycles within the three test sheds on Farm 1# and Farm 2.

Litter Treatments Adopted on F1 and F2 During the Study
New Shed 1 ##Partial Re-use Shed 2 Full Re-use Shed 3
Nature of bedding (1) Always new. (1) New and old. (1) Always old.
in sheds during the study on F1 and F2 (2) Litter removed after each cycle and new bedding placed. (2) Litter from brooder moved to grow-out and new bedding placed; litter from grow-out removed from shed (2) Bedding never removed but re-used across whole shed i.e., brooder and grow-out
Litter management between cycles during the study on F1 and F2 (all sheds cleaned sanitized between cycles, sprayed for insects) New bedding placed across whole shed Litter from brooder heaped into pile at grow-out end for ∼5 to 6 d and then spread at grow-out end. Clumps removed. (1) Farm 1: Litter heaped across entire length of shed for 5 d and spread.(2) Farm 2: Litter aerated mechanically, clumps removed and spread.
Biosecurity measures during cycleson F1 and F2
The use of footbaths with disinfectant and protective clothing on entry of authorized personnel

#Sixth cycle was run as free-range practice (Free Range Egg & Poultry Australia - FREPA) due to conversion of that farm to free-range.

##Described in (Chinivasagam et al., 2012 and Chinivasagam 2009).