Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):527–536. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4908

Table 3.

Outcomes in Focal vs. Control Nursing Environments by Patient Risk

N = 25,076 matched pairs
Outcome
Overall Rate
N = 25,076 pairs
Outcomes by Patient Risk Strata
Lowest
N = 5,015
Lower
N = 5,015
Middle
N = 5,016
Higher
N = 5,015
Highest
N = 5,015
30-day Mortality Rate (%)
 Focal 4.8 0.2 0.7 1.8 4.2 17.3
 Control 5.8 0.4 1.1 2.2 5.8 19.9
Difference in Mortality −1.0d −0.2 −0.3 −0.4 −1.6c −2.6c
ICU Utilization Rate (%)
 Focal 32.9 7.6 17.8 28.8 42.1 68.0
 Control 42.9 12.5 26.4 41.2 57.2 77.0
Difference in ICU Use −10.0d −4.9d −8.6d −12.4d −15.2d −9.1d
LOS (mean, days)
 Focal 8.7 2.8 5.6 7.9 10.9 16.3
 Control 8.8 3.1 5.8 8.2 11.2 15.8
Difference in LOS −0.1d −0.2d −0.2c −0.3b −0.3b 0.5
Comparative LOS % Δ −1.1% −7.9% −2.6% −3.6% −2.5% 3.1%
30-day Cost ($, mean)
 Focal 28,119 10,919 17,900 24,561 33,513 53,701
 Control 28,045 10,935 17,463 24,691 34,375 52,760
Difference in Cost 74 −16 437 −130 −862 941
Comparative Cost % Δ 0.3% −0.1% 2.5% −0.5% −2.5% 1.8%
30-day Cost without NTB Adjustment ($, mean)
 Focal 26,747 10,383 16,865 23,145 31,732 51,608
 Control 28,585 11,191 17,899 25,263 35,061 53,511
Difference in Cost −1,839d −808d −1,034c −2,118d −3,329d −1,904a
Comparative Cost % Δ −6.4% −7.2% −5.8% −8.4% −9.5% −3.6%

P-value Legend:

a

P < 0.05,

b

P < 0.01,

c

P < 0.001,

d

P < 0.0001.

P-values calculated using McNemar’s test for binary outcomes and the permutational t-test for continuous outcomes.