Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 22;16:631. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3257-9

Table 5.

Robustness tests: ordered probit model using the Katz index

Require assistance Moderately independent Highly independent
[1] [2] [3]
Female sample
Neighbourhood trust −0.16*** (0.05) −0.02* (0.01) 0.19*** (0.06)
Community participation −0.07*** (0.02) −0.01 (0.01) 0.08*** (0.03)
N = 148 N = 222 N = 189
Male sample
Neighbourhood trust −0.00 (0.04) −0.00 (0.05) 0.00 (0.10)
Community participation −0.04*** (0.01) −0.05*** (0.02) 0.09*** (0.03)
N = 101 N = 217 N = 349
Rural sample
Neighbourhood trust −0.14*** (0.04) −0.07*** (0.02) 0.20*** (0.06)
Community participation −0.06*** (0.02) −0.03*** (0.01) 0.09*** (0.02)
N = 200 N = 325 N = 366
Urban sample
Neighbourhood trust −0.03 (0.04) −0.04 (0.05) 0.06 (0.09)
Community participation −0.04** (0.02) −0.05** (0.02) 0.09** (0.04)
N = 49 N = 114 N = 172
Age category: 5060
Neighbourhood trust −0.04 (0.02) −0.06 (0.04) 0.10 (0.06)
Community participation −0.02** (0.01) 0.04* (0.01) 0.06** (0.03)
N = 86 N = 273 N = 433
Age category: 6170
Neighbourhood trust −0.24** (0.10) 0.04 (0.02) 0.20** (0.08)
Community participation −0.11*** (0.03) 0.02* (0.01) 0.09*** (0.03)
N = 114 N = 126 N = 91
Age category: 70+
Neighbourhood trust −0.29 (0.31) 0.18 (0.19) 0.11 (0.12)
Community participation −0.23*** (0.07) 0.14** (0.06) 0.09** (0.03)
N = 49 N = 40 N = 14

Note: We report marginal effects at means. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1