Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 22;14:54. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0128-x

Table 1.

Overview of key events in the implementation of the pilot research statement

Dates Action Theme
2013 Making the decision for change
 September Patient and public advisory group and R&D Board approve proposal for change, each in one sitting
 3rd October Trust Management Executive approves proposal
 3rd October–10th December Discussion about research statement’s content: research only or research and education? Self-organisation underpinned by conflict between groups
 10th December Board of Directors decides statement should exclusively concern research
2014
 10th January Board of Directors agree to pilot the statement in Services A and B
 1st April Email from Trust General Manager with responsibility for patient letters to Service C (where trust review of patient letters already taking place) arranging to implement pilot statement about research and education in this service
 7th April Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Manager with responsibility for implementing research statement challenges General Manager that new wording is not what was agreed
 17th April Trust Director for R&D decides to pilot research-only statement in a different service (Service D)
 30th April Service D’s R&D Lead agrees to pilot statement in that service Interaction between the health system and the research system
 1st May BRC Manager sends Service D’s Research Manager information about the letter statement
 25th June BRC manager asks Service D’s R&D Lead to impress on the service’s Research Manager the importance of implementing the letter statement
 10th July Research Manager says he will discuss with R&D Lead which clinics to implement the statement in and suggests the Manager for the wider clinical academic group may be responsible for implementation
 5th August Following a request from the BRC Manager, the clinical academic group’s Deputy Manager contacts the R&D Lead offering to “discuss the roll out”
 18th August R&D Lead emails BRC Manager to say no concerns reported from consultants “so please go ahead and arrange the necessary change in the clinic invite letter”
 28th August R&D Lead emails again asking if new letters have been sent to patients; BRC manager replies that he thought R&D Lead would inform him when new letters had been sent; they identify that no one is implementing letter change
 29th August R&D Lead asks clinical academic group’s Deputy Service Manger to liaise with administration to implement the change
 30th August Clinical academic group’s Deputy Manager contacts her manager to ask him to implement research statement
 17th October Clinical academic group’s Manager contacts Service D’s Service Manager and Patient Access Manager and asks them to change the letter
 24th October Research statement is implemented in Service D