Table 1.
Description of the characteristics of the 3 environmental pattern of census blocks according to their level of environmental exposure, deprivation and accessibility of the nearest healthcare after the classification
| Environmental patterns | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern 1 N = 147 | Pattern 2 N = 70 | Pattern 3 N = 19 | ||
| Environmental exposure | % of green space in a CB † | 4.35 ± 11.78a | 37.67 ± 29.79 | 84.51 ± 15.81 |
| % of CB with 10 m2 per habitant | 0 % | 1.43 % | 100 % | |
| % of CB with habitants living less than 150 m to roads | 64.63 % | 54.29 % | 5.26 % | |
| Accessibility of Healthcare † | Density of specialist/1.000 women | 1.85 ± 5.92 | 0.52 ± 2.41 | 0 |
| Distance to healthcare for women (meters) | 1141 ± 1704 | 4653 ± 4511 | 30334 ± 15473 | |
| Distance to healthcare for newborn (meters) | 1168 ± 1703 | 6706 ± 8340 | 53908 ± 14877 | |
| Time to nearest healthcare for women (minute) | 0.94 ± 1.69 | 4.87 ± 5.48 | 40.79 ± 16.15 | |
| Time to nearest healthcare for newborn (minute) | 2.47 ± 0.62 | 6.98 ± 9.43 | 53.18 ± 12.60 | |
| Index of deprivation | % Low deprived | 6.80 % | 80 % | 68.42 % |
| % Middle deprived | 39.46 % | 20 % | 31.58 % | |
| % High deprived | 53.74 % | 0 % | 0 % | |
| Mobility | % population who work in the city of residence | 71.41 ± 15.35 | 41.38 ± 21.28 | 39.83 ± 23.50 |
| % population who travel by public transport | 23.86 ± 8.74 | 6.59 ± 2.74 | 4.13 ± 2.79 | |
| % population who travel by foot | 16.05 ± 9.54 | 4.55 ± 3.33 | 14.69 ± 12.79 | |
| % population who travel by bike | 10.01 ± 3.84 | 7.24 ± 3.75 | 3.49 ± 7.09 | |
| % population who travel by car | 46.09 ± 13.62 | 78.10 ± 5.99 | 72.46 ± 15.05 | |
CB census blocks
amean ± standard deviation