Table 3. Effects of different participants’ characteristics on the perceived ease of use (N = 252).
N | M | SD | F | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Female | 162 | 3.49 | 0.51 | 3.35 | 0.068 |
Male | 90 | 3.36 | 0.63 | |||
Age | ≤45 | 135 | 3.46 | 0.56 | 0.30 | 0.586 |
>45 | 117 | 3.43 | 0.56 | |||
Educational level | Low | 61 | 3.33 | 0.68 | 2.22 | 0.111 |
Middle | 66 | 3.53 | 0.39 | |||
High | 125 | 3.46 | 0.57 | |||
Residential area | Region of Hamburg | 62 | 3.42 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 0.668 |
Other regions | 190 | 3.45 | 0.56 | |||
Experience with mental disorders | Affected people | 139 | 3.41 | 0.58 | 1.15 | 0.328 |
Relatives | 65 | 3.44 | 0.56 | |||
Experts | 25 | 3.61 | 0.44 | |||
None | 23 | 3.54 | 0.54 | |||
Frequency of use | First time users | 185 | 3.43 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.428 |
Multiple users | 67 | 3.49 | 0.46 | |||
Date of attendance | Before the integration of the first PtDA | 156 | 3.40 | 0.60 | 2.99 | 0.085 |
After the integration of the first PtDA | 96 | 3.52 | 0.48 |
Notes.
- M
- mean
- SD
- standard deviation