Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul;6(3):e251–e259. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1585577

Table 1. Demographics of study cohort.

Demographics Overall values SVD
n = 368
CD
n = 223
Significance of difference
(p Value for SVD vs. CD)
Age (y)
 Median age 30 29.2 29. 9 0.46
Parity
 Nulliparous 153/591 (26%) 91/368 (24.7%) 62/223 (27.8%) 0.41
 Parous 438/591 (74%) 277/368(75.3%) 161/223 (72.2%)
Gestational age (wk)
 23–27 26/591 (4.4%) 12/368 (3.3%) 14/223 (6.3%) < 0.001
 28–32 89/591 (15.1%) 38/368 (10.3%) 51/223 (22.9%)
 33–36 476/591 (80.5%) 318/368(86.4%) 158/223 (70.9%)
Administration of antenatal steroids (wk)
 23–27 25/26 (96.2%) 12/368 (3.3%) 13/223 (5.8%) 0.21
 28–32 83/89 (93.3%) 34/368 (9.2%) 49/223 (21.9%)
Race/ethnicity
 White 14/591 (2.4%) 8/368 (2.1%) 6/223 (2.7%) 0.01
 Black 73/591 (12.4%) 33/368 (9%) 40/223 (17.9%)
 Hispanic 485/591 (82.1%) 315/368 (85.6%) 170/223 (76.2%)
 Asian 16/591 (2.7%) 9/368 (2.4%) 7/223 (3.1%)
 Other 3/591 (0.51%) 3/368 (0.8%) 0/223 (0%)
Presentation
 Cephalic 496/591 (83.9%) 342/368 (92.9%) 154/223 (69.1%) < 0.001
 Breech 65/591 (11%) 10/368 (2.7%) 55/223 (24.7%)
 Undocumented 30/591 (5.1%) 16/368 (4.3%) 14/223 (6.3%)
Multiples
 Twins 46/591 (7.8%) 19/368 (5.1%) 27/223 (12.1%) 0.004

Abbreviations: CD, cesarean delivery; SVD, spontaneous vaginal delivery.

Note: The majority of our cohort was Hispanic, multiparous, and had a cephalic presentation. Bold values show a significant difference (p < 0.05) between Cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery groups.