Table 5.

Correlation table for CTB administration.

Correlations
	CFQ	APM	Alerting	Orientation	Conflict	ANT RT	GMLT errors	MRT speed	MRT accuracy
CFQ score
Pearson correlation	1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N	8
APM score
Pearson correlation	0.132	1
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.755
N	8	8
ANT alerting
Pearson correlation	−0.060	0.766∗	1
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.888	0.027
N	8	8	29
ANT orientation
Pearson correlation	0.233	−0.195	0.249	1
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.579	0.643	0.193
N	8	8	29	29
ANT conflict
Pearson correlation	0.397	0.382	0.081	0.356	1
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.330	0.350	0.674	0.058
N	8	8	29	29	29
ANT reaction time
Pearson correlation	0.131	0.072	−0.036	0.587∗∗	0.750∗∗	1
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.757	0.865	0.853	0.001	0.000
N	8	8	29	29	29	29
GMLT total errors
Pearson correlation	0.477	−0.180	0.434∗	0.298	0.089	0.194	1
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.279	0.700	0.021	0.124	0.653	0.323
N	7	7	28	28	28	28	319
MRT speed
Pearson correlation	0.447	0.062	0.031	0.332	0.150	0.218	0.295	1
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.267	0.884	0.877	0.091	0.454	0.274	0.064
N	8	8	27	27	27	27	40	43
MRT accuracy
Pearson correlation	0.775∗	−0.244	−0.126	0.160	−0.076	−0.132	0.138	0.451∗∗	1
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.024	0.560	0.531	0.425	0.705	0.511	0.396	0.002
N	8	8	27	27	27	27	40	43	43

^∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

^∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).