Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adv Nurs. 2016 Apr 8;72(9):2077–2085. doi: 10.1111/jan.12974

Table 3.

Skin Tone Categories and Incidence of Trunk Skin Damage by Ethnicity/Race (N (%))

Ethnicity/Skin Tone N (% of ethnicity) Erythema/Stage 1 Stage 2/3/4
African American 122 17 (14%) 21 (17%)
 Dark skin tone 66 (54%) 3 (4%) 8 (12%)
 Medium skin tone 45 (37%) 10 (22%) 10 (22%)
 Light skin tone 11 (9%) 4 (36%) 3 (27%)
Asian American 50 32 (64%) 12 (24%)
 Dark skin tone 0 -- --
 Medium skin tone 11 (22%) 7 (64%) 4 (36%)
 Light skin tone 39 (78%) 25 (64%) 8 (21%)
Caucasian 156 44 (28%) 37 (24%)
 Dark skin tone 0 -- --
 Medium skin tone 8 (5%) 3 (37%) 1 (12%)
 Light skin tone 148 (95%) 41 (28%) 36 (24%)
Hispanic 89 39 (44%) 16 (18%)
 Dark skin tone 2 (2%) 1 (50%) 0
 Medium skin tone 29 (33%) 11 (38%) 7 (24%)
 Light skin tone 58 (65%) 27 (47%) 9 (15%)
Total 417 132 (32%) 86 (21%)
 Dark skin tone 68 (16%) 4 (6%) 8 (12%)
 Medium skin tone 93 (22%) 31 (33%) 22 (24%)
 Light skin tone 256 (61%) 97 (38%) 56 (22%)

Note. Logistic regression models predicting incidence for erythema/Stage 1 and for Stage 2/3/4 were run separately for skin ton and ethnicity, with gender, age, and Braden score as covariates. Skin tone was a significant predictor of erythema/Stage 1 incidence (p=0.003), but not Stage 2/3/4 incidence. Ethnicity was not a significant predictor for either level of skin damage.