Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Jun 16;27(8):1204–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.036

Table 7.

Cox Proportional Hazards for outcome of restenosis

Univariate Model Multiple Variable Model

HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value

CKD Stage **
 5 1.4 (0.8–2.3) 0.26
 4/3b 0.9 (0.6–1.3) 0.61
 1/2/3a 1.0 (reference)

Age, per 10 years 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 0.61 **

Gender
 Female 1.5 (1.1–1.9) 0.007 1.5 (1.2–2.0)
 Male 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 0.003

Smoking Status **
 Current 0.9 (0.6–1.3) 0.52
 Former 0.7 (0.5–0.99) 0.047
 Never 1.0 (reference)

Diabetes **
 Yes 1.2 (0.9–1.6) 0.15
 No 1.0 (reference)

Coronary arterial disease **
 Yes 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.57
 No 1.0 (reference)

TASC Class
 C or D 1.4 (1.03–1.9) 0.03 1.4 (1.02–1.9) 0.04
 A or B 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)

Treatment **
 Plain old balloon angioplasty 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 0.82
 Stent 1.0 (reference)

Run-off Score **
 0 or 1 1.1 (0.8–1.6) 0.45
 2 0.9 (0.7–1.3) 0.67
 3 1.0 (reference)
**

Variable not retained using backward selection method, alpha-level = 0.05 for retention.