Table 1. Some of the studies published in literature comparing VATS and open technique in thymic malignancies.
Author, year and country | Type of study | N (VATS/open) | Morbidity and mortality | Blood loss | Hospital stay | Recurrence rate | Survival |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Friedant, 2016, USA (1) | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 1,355/683 | No difference | No difference | Shorter in VATS | No difference | No difference |
Xie, 2015, Australia (2) | Systematic review | 540/521 | Less pneumonia, no difference in mortality | Less in VATS | Shorter in VATS | No difference | No difference |
Manoly, 2014, UK (3) | Retrospective case series | 17/22 | Less pneumonia, no difference in mortality | Less need for transfusion in VATS | Shorter in VATS | No difference | No difference |
Sakamaki, 2014, Japan (4) | Retrospective case series | 71/11 | No difference | No difference | NS | No difference | Lower in open group |
Jurado, 2012, USA (5) | Retrospective case series | 77/186 | No difference | Less in VATS | Shorter in VATS | No difference | No difference |
NS, not stated.