Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul;8(7):1587–1600. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.01

Table 1. Meta-analysis of the association between Oct-4 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC.

Characteristics N No. samples Heterogeneity (I2, P) Model OR (95% CI) P value Publication bias Conclusion
Total PE NE Begg (P) Egger (P)
Gender (male vs. female) 10 943 470 473 0.0%, 0.999 Fixed 0.868 (0.650–1.159) 0.337 0.371 0.273 Not significant
Age (≥60 vs. <60 years) 9 830 413 417 0.0%, 0.631 Fixed 1.033 (0.772–1.383) 0.828 Not significant
Smoking status (yes vs. no) 4 408 214 194 0.0%, 0.907 Fixed 1.099 (0.711–1.700) 0.671 Not significant
Differentiation (G3 vs. G1 and G2) 10 875 416 459 74.7%, <0.001 Random 3.065 (1.568–5.957) 0.001 0.283 0.456 Significant
TNM stage (III/IV vs. I/II) 11 998 502 496 57.4%, 0.009 Random 3.695 (2.252–6.063) <0.001 0.087 0.216 Significant
Lymphatic metastasis (yes vs. no) 9 965 455 510 60.1%, 0.010 Random 2.372 (1.504–3.742) <0.001 Significant
Histological subtypes (AC vs. SCC) 9 788 405 383 63.8%, 0.005 Random 1.301 (0.749–2.261) 0.351 Not significant

AC, adenocarcinoma; CI, confidence interval; NE, negative expression; NI, no information; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; Oct-4, octamer-binding transcription factor 4; OR, odds ratio; PE, positive expression; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.