Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul;8(7):1587–1600. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.01

Table 2. Prognostic significance of Oct-4 expression for OS in patients with NSCLC.

Groups of outcomes N No. samples Heterogeneity (I2, P) Model HR (95% CI) P value Conclusion
Total PE NE
Overall 8 707 377 330 15.1%, 0.308 Fixed 3.030 (2.283–4.021) <0.001 Significant
Statistical analysis
   Multivariate analysis 2 259 144 115 0.0%, 0.431 Fixed 2.175 (1.423–3.326) <0.001 Significant
   Univariate analysis 6 448 233 215 0.0%, 0.597 Fixed 3.948 (2.701–5.770) <0.001 Significant
Origins of patients
   China mainland 5 436 189 247 15.3%, 0.316 Fixed 3.564 (2.484–5.113) <0.001 Significant
   Taiwan 3 271 188 83 0.0%, 0.471 Fixed 2.340 (1.484–3.690) <0.001 Significant
Positive-staining sites
   Nucleus 4 310 137 173 2.4%, 0.393 Fixed 4.301 (2.733–6.767) <0.001 Significant
   Non-nucleus Given up because of the scarcity of available data
Histological subtypes1
   AC 3 196 133 63 36.4%, 0.208 Fixed 4.108 (2.166–7.790) <0.001 Significant
   SCC 1 52 17 35 3.822 (1.084–13.470) 0.037 Significant

1, the clinical data of each histological subtypes of NSCLC was only reported in (13,18,19). AC, adenocarcinoma; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NE, negative expression; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; Oct-4, octamer-binding transcription factor 4; OS, overall survival; PE, positive expression; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.