Table S2. Diagnostic accuracy of CCTA vs. ExECG in the included studies.
| Effort size | Cademartiri F et al. (8) | Hamilton-Craig et al. (9) | Maffei E et al. (10) | Mollet NR et al. (11) | Nagori M et al. (12) | Nieman K et al. (13) | Ovrehus KA et al. (14) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCTA | ExECG | CCTA | ExECG | CCTA | ExECG | CCTA | ExECG | CCTA | ExECG | CCTA | ExECG | CCTA | ExECG | |||||||
| N | 42 | 37 | 322 | 240 | 147 | 147 | 61 | 52 | 41 | 40 | 96 | 59 | 95 | 97 | ||||||
| TP | 32 | 22 | 18 | 5 | 72 | 35 | 46 | 31 | 18 | 8 | 53 | 24 | 26 | 20 | ||||||
| FP | 1 | 3 | 17 | 22 | 25 | 34 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 6 | 11 | 43 | ||||||
| FN | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 40 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 8 | ||||||
| TN | 9 | 6 | 287 | 212 | 47 | 38 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 28 | 15 | 19 | 57 | 26 | ||||||
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 79 | 100 | 83 | 96 | 46.7 | 100 | 79.5 | 100 | 72.7 | 96 | 71 | 96 | 71 | ||||||
| Specificity (%) | 90 | 67 | 94 | 91 | 65.3 | 52.8 | 86.7 | 69.2 | 95.6 | 96.6 | 37 | 76 | 84 | 38 | ||||||
| PPV (%) | 97 | 88 | 51 | 19 | 74.2 | 50.7 | 95.8 | 88.6 | 94.7 | 88.9 | 67 | 80 | 70 | 32 | ||||||
| NPV (%) | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 94 | 48.7 | 100 | 52.9 | 100 | 90.3 | 88 | 66 | 98 | 77 | ||||||
| PLR | 10.00 | 2.36 | 17.90 | 8.86 | 2.76 | 1.00 | 7.5 | 2.58 | 23.00 | 21.10 | 1.52 | 2.94 | 9.20 | 1.15 | ||||||
| NLR | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 1.01 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.76 | ||||||
CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; ExECG, exercise electrocardiography; TP, true positive; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; TN, true negative; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio.