Skip to main content
. 2016 May 2;82(10):3042–3051. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00261-16

TABLE 3.

Comparison of yield and viability of C. burnetii grown in ACCM-2, ACCM-D, or ACCM-D (−glucose) for 14 daysa

Medium GE/ml FFU/ml CFU/ml GE/FFU GE/CFU
ACCM-2 2.46 × 108 6.24 × 106 8.75 × 106 38.77 ± 10.81 18.90 ± 3.21
ACCM-D 1.44 × 109 2.57 × 108 4.63 × 108 6.02 ± 3.28b 3.13 ± 3.24b
ACCM-D (−glucose) 1.18 × 109 3.00 × 108 5.67 × 108 3.92 ± 1.05b 2.42 ± 1.49b
a

GE, genome equivalents; FFU, focus-forming units. The results represent the mean of the results from three independent experiments (for GE/ml, FFU/ml, and CFU/ml) or the mean ± standard deviation of the results from three independent experiments (for GE/FFU and GE/CFU).

b

Statistical difference compared to ACCM-2 determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P < 0.005).