Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;15(Suppl 1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0178-x

Table 6.

Comparison of Kappa indices for OPT1 with 100 individuals and 60 generations, and OPT3 with 200 individuals and 90 generations, with respect to OPT1, OPT2, and OPT3 with 50 individuals and 50 generations

Subject OPT1 (100,60) OPT1 (50,50) OPT2 (50, 50) OPT3 (200,90) OPT3 (50,50)
Kappa index (x# mean, std) Kappa index (x# mean, std) Kappa index (x# mean, std) Kappa index (x# mean, std) Kappa index (x# mean, std)
104 0.841 ± 0.018 0.819 ± 0.013 0.902 ± 0.010 0.897 ± 0.019 0.882 ± 0.022
107 0.836 ± 0.016 0.816 ± 0.018 0.880 ± 0.011 0.865 ± 0.018 0.845 ± 0.022
Subject OPT1 (100,60) OPT1 (50,50) OPT2 (50, 50) OPT3 (200,90) OPT3 (50,50)
Kappa index (xe# mean, std) Kappa index (xe# mean, std) Kappa index (xe# mean, std) Kappa index (xe# mean, std) Kappa index (xe# mean, std)
104 0.515 ± 0.047 0.510 ± 0.056 0.545 ± 0.035 0.573 ± 0.032 0.563 ± 0.034
107 0.580 ± 0.052 0.560 ± 0.041 0.634 ± 0.019 0.644 ± 0.022 0.603 ± 0.027

x# evaluation was done with training patterns, xe# evaluation was done with test patterns

Italic values represent the best values provided by any alternative procedure for a given subject