Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 25;6(2):252–267. doi: 10.1159/000447124

Table 2.

Instantaneous average power in the LB (<1.5 Hz) and HB (>1.5 Hz)

Power Controls AD nonfallers AD fallers Intergroup p value
Intragroup p value
C vs. AD fallers C vs. AD nonfallers AD fallers vs. AD nonfallers C AD fallers AD nonfallers
−4 to 0 s −4 to 0 vs. 0–4 s
 LB, μ 49,269±153,186 75,092±54,267 107,734±213,439 0.021 0.156 0.552 0.992 0.638 0.426
 HB, μ 38,452±227,522 90,412±102,705 137,576±113,418 0.001 0.037 0.131 0.002 0.067 0.074
0–4S 0–4 vs. 4–8 s
 LB, μ 53,887±55,417 93,178±100,454 86,086±561,911 0.018 0.188 0.456 0.352 0.067 0.426
 HB, μ 87,021±170,807 141,058±112,508 200,029±1996,252 0.012 0.117 0.331 0.01 0.005 0.020
4–8 s −4 to 0 vs. 4–8 s
 LB, μ 58,180±40,505 74,877±96,107 123,381±396,144 0.008 0.383 0.261 0.953 0.557 1.000
 HB, μ 102,373±371,794 125,411±191,455 286,321±659,403 0.011 0.156 0.175 0.490 0.206 0.496

Data are presented as medians ± standard deviation unless specified otherwise. Significant p values are in italics. Descriptive table of instantaneous average power (median + 1 standard deviation) in the LB (<1.5 Hz) and HB (>1.5 Hz) on the z-axis during different time intervals: 4 s before environment change (−4 to 0 s), immediately after visual perturbation till 4 s later (0–4 s), and from 4 s till 8 s later (4–8 s). Pairwise post hoc analysis of intergroup comparison [controls (C), AD fallers, and AD nonfallers] and Wilcoxon paired t test analysis of intragroup comparison.