Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cardiol Clin. 2016 Aug;34(3):363–374. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2016.04.001

Table 1.

Characterization of 11 Major PAH Registries

Registry Study Cohort Number Time Period Study Design Study cohort IPAH/HPAH vs. APAH
NIH IPAH 187 1981-1985 Prospective Incident cases NA
Chinese IPAH/HPAH 72 1999-2004 Prospective Incident cases NA
COMPERA§ IPAH/HPAH 587 2007-2011 Prospective Incident cases NA
French Group I PAH 674 2002-2003 Prospective Incident and prevalent cases 39% vs. 61%
Mayo Group I PAH 484 1995-2004 Prospective Incident and prevalent cases
New Chinese Group I PAH 956 2008-2011 Prospective Incident cases 35% vs. 65%
PHC Group I PAH 578 1982-2006 Retrospective &
Prospective
Incident and prevalent cases 48% vs. 52%
REVEAL Group I PAH 3515 2006-2009 Prospective Incident and prevalent cases 46% vs. 54%
Scottish-SMR Group I PAH 374 1986-2001 Retrospective Incident cases 47% vs. 54%
Spanish Group I PAH
CTEPH
866/162 1998-2008 Retrospective &
Prospective
Incident and prevalent cases 36% vs. 64%
UK and Ireland IPAH, HPAH, and
Anorexigen-APAH
482 2001-2009 Incident cases 98.3% vs. 1.7%
§

- COMPERA registry enrolled patients with any WHO group PH. The data presented here is for the incident IPAH cohort only.

NIH – national institutes of health, PHC – pulmonary hypertension connections, PAH – pulmonary arterial hypertension, IPAH – idiopathic PAH, and CTEPH – chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, HPAH – heritable PAH, and APAH – associated PAH.