Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Violence. 2016 Jul;6(3):421–432. doi: 10.1037/vio0000049

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Teen Choices and Comparison Participants^

Variable Teen Choices (n =1,389) Comparison (n=1,216) F (1, 2585)
% %
Gender Female 53.3% 53.7% 0.00
Male 46.7% 46.3%
Race/ethicity White, non-Hispanic 82.2% 76.1% 0.05
Other 17.8% 23.9%
Subsidized lunch Yes 22.2% 23.4% 0.04
No/don't know 77.8% 76.6%
Grade in school^^ Grade 9 26.7% 19.3% 4.41*
Grade 10 21.2% 43.9%
Grade 11 51.8% 36.7%
Dating partners past year 0 15.4% 15.5% 1.75
1 28.1% 33.2%
2 23.4% 24.0%
3 or more 33.0% 27.2%
Current dating status Dating 40.3% 36.7% 3.26
Not dating 59.7% 63.3%
Sexual orientation Straight 92.9% 92.1% 0.53
Not straight/don't know 7.1% 7.9%
Stage of change for using skills Pre-Action 59.5% 57.6% 0.50
Action or Maintenance 40.5% 42.4%
Consistent skill use Yes 12.8% 13.6% 0.37
No 87.2% 86.4%
Reject dating violence attitues Yes 39.2% 38.3% 0.03
No 60.8% 61.7%
Emotional victimization past year Yes 67.3% 65.3% 0.79
No 32.7% 34.7%
Emotional perpetration past year Yes 57.3% 54.9% 0.68
No 42.7% 45.1%
Physical victimization past year Yes 35.6% 31.8% 4.05*
No 64.4% 68.2%
Physical perpetration past year Yes 18.5% 16.4% 0.92
No 81.5% 83.6%
^

All participants in the analysis sample were exposed to risk for dating violence: they had experienced or perpetrated emotional or physical dating violence in the year prior to the study, were current daters at baseline, or dated during the follow-up period.

^^

Three Intervention and one Comparison participant recorded their grade as “other.”

*

p <.05