Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;7(3):215–228. doi: 10.1007/s12687-016-0269-1

Table 2.

Approaches to enhancing community genetic literacy

Approach Benefits Challenges
Specialist staff outreach delivery (one-to-one or group sessions; with or without materials) • Consistent and accurate message
• Information tailored to need
• Easy service referral if needed
• Use of accessible community venues
• Limited reach
• May be mistrusted
• Anonymity not guaranteed
• High cost (particularly if external consultants used)
Community-based existing generalist staff delivery (one-to-one or group sessions, with or without materials) • Trusted by community
• Sensitive to community dynamics
• May encourage self-referral
• Use of accessible community venues
• Require support
• Danger of inaccurate and inconsistent messages
• No tailoring of information to need
• Competing agendas—focus lost
• Anonymity not guaranteed
Stand-alone printed leaflets for general population (English and community languages) • Wide reach
• Anonymous access possible
• Low cost
• Poorly targeted
• Limited detail possible
• Inaccessible to non-literate
• No tailoring of information to need
• No opportunity for clarification
• Reliant on self-referral
• Limited durability
Stand-alone printed booklets for families at risk • Comprehensive information
• Durable—repeated reading possible
• Limited reach
• Reliant on self-referral
• No opportunity for clarification
• Inaccessible to non-literate
• High cost
Stand-alone website material (including embedded video material) • Easily accessed
• Comprehensive information
• Wide potential reach
• Durable; repeat reading possible
• Video content may be accessible to non-literate
• Unsuitable for some sub-groups
• Reliant on self-referral
• No opportunity for clarification
TV broadcast in GP practices • Wide reach
• Credibility of NHS location
• Consistent, accurate
• Durable; repeat watching possible
• Poorly targeted
• Easily ignored
• No opportunity for clarification
• Reliant on self-referral
• High cost
Integrated message within general infant health education materials • Non-stigmatising
• Wide reach
• Anonymous access possible
• Low cost
• Poorly targeted
• Very limited detail
• No tailoring of information to need
• No opportunity for clarification
• Reliant on self-referral
• Limited durability