Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 26;68(4):1499–1511. doi: 10.1007/s10616-015-9910-9

Table 4.

Stochastic explanatory productivity models for the six cell lines

Cell line R2
38 y = 3.70 − 0.020G1 − 0.037ER 0.775
38 y = 0.249 − 0.072G2 − 0.013ER 0.923
38 y = 1.305 + 0.087G2 − 0.010ER − 0.015Mito 0.955
47 y = 3.246 + 0.005G1 − 0.024ER 0.761
47 y = 4.979 − 0.054G2 − 0.024ER 0.923
47 y = 4.929 − 0.054G2 − 0.024ER + 0.0000Mito 0.923
76* y = 6.752 − 0.043G1 − 0.047ER 0.882
76 y = 3.150 + 0.030G2 − 0.035ER 0.863
76 y = 1.362 − 0.024G2 − 0.026ER + 0.024Mito 0.959
150** y = 1.617 + 0.007G1 − 0.028ER 0.742
150 y = 3.988 − 0.045G2 − 0.023ER 0.923
150 y = 2.755 + 0.043G2 − 0.026ER + 0.014Mito 0.935
160 y = 1.617 + 0.007G1 − 0.028ER 0.742
160 y = 2.696 − 0.028G2 − 0.031ER 0.763
160*** y = 2.160 − 0.028G2 − 0.031ER + 0.006Mito 0.763
164 y = 5.112 − 0.038G1 − 0.038ER 0.924
164 y = 1.570 + 0.046G2 − 0.033ER 0.898
164 y = 6.049 − 0.044G2 − 0.039ER − 0.005Mito 0.925

These models are all statistically significant models based on the level of significance of the variable

* Not valid because G1 ≈ ER = 0.94 collinearity; ** Not valid because G1 ≈ ER = 0.90 Colinearity; *** Model is not statistically significant

G1, S, G2 cell cycle phases, ER endoplasmic reticulum, Mito mitochondrial membrane; and potential/mitochondrial mass (MMP/MM ratio), R 2 goodness of fit