Table 5.
Comparison of selected stochastic explanatory models for the six cell lines
| Cell line | Model | R2 | Mab µg/ml |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | y = 1.305 + 0.087G2 − 0.010ER − 0.015Mito | 0.955 | 1179.4 (3) |
| 47 | y = 4.979 − 0.054G2 − 0.024ER | 0.923 | 1462.7 (1) |
| 76 | y = 1.362 − 0.024G2 − 0.026ER + 0.024Mito | 0.959 | 1312.5 (2) |
| 150 | y = 3.988 − 0.045G2 − 0.023ER | 0.923 | 1021.6 (4) |
| 160 | y = 2.696 − 0.028G1 − 0.031ER | 0.742 | 302.2 (6) |
| 164 | y = 6.049 − 0.044G2 − 0.039ER − 0.005Mito | 0.925 | 755.2 (5) |
G1, S, G2 cell cycle phases, ER endoplasmic reticulum, Mito mitochondrial membrane; potential/mitochondrial mass (MMP/MM ratio), R 2 goodness of fit