Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 26;7:1155. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01155

Table 2.

Identified “keystone” OTUs in co-abundance networks.

OTU IDa Familyb Betweenness Closeness Neighborhood Connectivity Topological Coefficient Module Membership
268 NAc 0.51 0.71 8 0.36 Brown
179d Rhodobacteraceae 0.29 0.51 5 0.28 Brown
1070 NA 0.14 0.9 151 0.16 Turquoise
264 Erythrobacteraceae 0.11 0.63 8 0.41 Brown
265 NA 0.08 0.62 8 0.43 Brown
267 NA 0.07 0.6 9 0.45 Brown
1057 NA 0.06 0.85 161 0.17 Turquoise
176 Rhodobacteraceae 0.05 0.38 3 0.47 Brown
91 Alteromonadaceae 0.05 0.49 276 0.3 Blue
126 Rhodobacteraceae 0.05 0.47 10 0.53 Brown
1040 NA 0.04 0.82 165 0.18 Turquoise
1009 NA 0.03 0.81 163 0.18 Turquoise
1066 NA 0.03 0.8 165 0.18 Turquoise
266 NA 0.03 0.56 10 0.51 Brown
1087 NA 0.02 0.79 168 0.18 Turquoise
1048 NA 0.02 0.8 167 0.18 Turquoise
131 Rhodobacteraceae 0.02 0.52 10 0.5 Brown
257 NA 0.02 0.55 10 0.54 Brown
89 Alteromonadaceae 0.02 0.48 643 0.7 Yellow
92 Alteromonadaceae 0.02 0.33 11 0.44 Yellow
a

Assigned OTU identity.

b

OTU taxonomy at family level.

c

NA, OTU taxonomic assignment not available at family level.

d

Proposed “keystone” OTUs Rhodobacteraceae and Alteromonadaceae are highlighted in bold.