Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):188–193. doi: 10.1159/000444359

Table 4.

Comparison of mammography and ultrasound findings between the mastalgia and asymptomatic groups

Total, n (%) Mastalgia, n (%) Asymptomatic, n (%) p
Mammographic breast density (pattern) (n=503)
 A 44 (8.7) 21 (5.6) 23 (18.3) a0.001**
 B 373 (74.2) 299 (79.3) 74 (58.7) a0.001**
 C 80 (15.9) 54 (14.3) 26 (20.6) a0.094
 D 6 (1.2) 3 (0.8) 3 (2.4) b0.169
Mammographic BI-RADS category (n=503)
 BI-RADS 0 278 (55.3) 210 (55.7) 68 (54.0) a0.735
 BI-RADS 1 62 (12.3) 29 (7.7) 33 (26.2) a0.001**
 BI-RADS 2 127 (25.2) 110 (29.2) 17 (13.5) c0.001**
 BI-RADS 3 22 (4.4) 15 (4.0) 7 (5.6) c0.619
 BI-RADS 4 8 (1.6) 8 (2.1) 0 (0.0) b0.210
 BI-RADS 5 6 (1.2) 5 (1.3) 1 (0.8) b1.000
Ultrasound findings (n=513)
 Normal 80 (15.6) 59 (16.6) 21 (13.4) a0.358
 Simple cyst(s) 30 (5.8) 30 (8.4) 0 (0.0) c0.001**
 Fibroadenoma(s) 68 (13.3) 55 (15.4) 13 (8.3) c0.039*
 Fibrocystic disease 323 (63.0) 297 (83.4) 123 (78.3) b0.168
 IMLN 8 (1.6) 8 (2.2) 0 (0.0) b0.114
 Complex cyst(s) 2 (0.4) 2 (0.6) 0 (0.0) b1.000
 Fatty tissue necrosis 2 (0.4) 2 (0.6) 0 (0.0) b1.000
a

Pearson's chi-squared test

b

Fisher's exact test

c

Yates' continuity correction

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

Some cases harbor multiple ultrasound findings

IMLN = intramammary lymph node(s).