Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;5(4):358–371. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.09

Table 5. Prevalence of malnutrition according to CTP grades.

Nutrition assessment tool Nutrition status CTP grade (n, %) P value
A B C
BMI (N=54) Normal 1 (3.4) 12 (41.4) 16 (55.2) 0.737
Under-weight 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (100.0)
Preobese 0 (0.0) 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5)
Over-weight 0 (0.0) 3 (25.0) 9 (75.0)
BMI for ascites (N=54) Normal 1 (2.9) 13 (37.1) 21 (60.0) 0.755
Severe 0 (0.0) 7 (36.8) 12 (63.2)
MUAC (N=54) Normal 0 (0.0) 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0) 0.912
Moderate 0 (0.0) 2 (25.0) 6 (75.0)
Severe 1 (2.4) 16 (39.0) 24 (58.5)
MAMC (N=54) Normal 1 (3.8) 11(42.3) 14 (53.8) 0.459
Moderate 0 (0.0) 7 (28.0) 18 (72.0)
Severe 0 (0.0) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3)
SGA (N=54) Normal 1 (16.7) 4 (66.7) 1 (16.7) 0.010*
Moderate 0 (0.0) 14 (31.1) 31 (68.9)
Severe 0 (0.0) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3)
Mean phase angle (N=20) Normal 0 (0.0) 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0.329
Abnormal 1 (5.6) 8 (44.4) 9 (50.0)
HG (N=54) (mean ± SD) 92±0 40±16.1 35.2±14.8 0.152

Chi-square test (n, %), *, P<0.05 (between different CTP grades); Kruskal Wallis test: (mean ± SD), *, P <0.05 (between different CTP grades). CTP, child turcotte and pugh; BMI, body mass index; MUAC, mid upper arm circumference; MAMC, mid arm muscle circumference; SGA, subjective global assessment; HG, hand grip strength.